3 ms·
One product listed as better than others but no evidence given. Likely paid advertisement.
by jl2718 8y ago
One product listed as better than others but no evidence given. Likely paid advertisement.
- neonate 8y agoI doubt that such a well-known blogger would risk his reputation so recklessly.
- jl2718 8y agoBloggers get paid. Shocking.
- mundo 8y agoReally, really false. He explains in detail why it's better, and then advises people to still not take it.
- jl2718 8y agoDetails: it comes in a packet instead of a pill, he likes the team, it has 7 ingredients instead of 20. I can't find one science-based reason to take this particular brand that he links to and keeps on praising throughout the article. This level of shilling requires a disclosure statement.
- mundo 8y agoThis is still false. He does not praise it (beyond "it's better than the really bad one I just described"), and he explicitly advises against taking it. I can only suggest reading the article more carefully because you've missed the entire point of it, which is to avoid all such combo-pills and experiment with nootropics (if at all) one at a time.
- meowface 8y agoAbsurd. Did you read it?
- jl2718 8y ago"90% of the people making branded combo nootropics are lying scum. A few, like XXXXX, seem like probably decent people trying to get it right – but are you confident you can tell them apart?" Of course not, so just go with brand XXXXX, right?