3 ms·
>I am ok with making saying the holocaust didn’t happen illegal, or making Nazi imagery illegal even though it is a restriction on speech. People don’t deserve
by marcoperaza 8y ago
>I am ok with making saying the holocaust didn’t happen illegal, or making Nazi imagery illegal even though it is a restriction on speech.
People don’t deserve punishment for the contents of their conscience or their beliefs, no matter how wrong their beliefs are. To take a man’s freedom for speaking his mind is one of the most abhorrent things you can do in this world.
Why is it that the Nazi iconography and holocaust denial is always singled out, but no one ever bans Soviet apologia or imagery? Could it be that the powerful forces in Europe are more sympathetic to one side than the other? Both are clear cut cases of murderous regimes whose ideas belong in the history books, but already the censors you are eager to trust are abusing their power to further their political agenda.
- drivingmenuts 8y ago> Soviet apologia or imagery Is that actually a bigger problem in the EU than it has been in the past? There have always been admirers of the USSR in every country, but if I recall, they've always been a tiny percentage compared to Nazi apologists, aside from Russia. I also don't recall any of them being outright racist and calling for wholesale destruction in the way that other extremists have done. I could be wrong there - I'm not a huge consumer of Nazi or Soviet propaganda.
- marcoperaza 8y agoEurope is full of active self-identifying communist parties, many with seats in the various parliaments. Or how about the yearly ritual of masked French far-left activists wreaking havoc on the streets. Why is no one banning these violent extremists?