4 ms·
> Caching Google makes no sense beyond some static resources. Really? So you cannot make any sense of the idea of caching, say, news articles? Blog posts? Soft
by mehrdadn 8y ago
> Caching Google makes no sense beyond some static resources.
Really? So you cannot make any sense of the idea of caching, say, news articles? Blog posts? Software documentation? StackOverflow Qs/As? The cached pages are 100% useless in your mind?
- majewsky 8y agoAll of those are not Google. OP was probably thinking of SERPs.
- Freak_NL 8y agoIndeed.
- mehrdadn 8y agoI think lack of sleep got the better of me there, sorry :\ but I still don't see what the issue with caching search engine results is. Why shouldn't result pages be cached? I would totally want to cache them locally when on such a high-latency connection, especially when I can expect similar queries (like in a classroom).