3 ms·
From what I see, the problem isn't so much with the truth, but rather the narrative and interpretation of these facts. For example, suppose a vaccine had a 90%
by anoncow2018sund 8y ago
From what I see, the problem isn't so much with the truth, but rather the narrative and interpretation of these facts.
For example, suppose a vaccine had a 90% success rate. This is the truth, however anti-vaxxers will focus on the 10% failure rate.
Both China and Taiwan agree there was a civil war and the losers retreated to Taiwan. However, the narrative of the event is where it differs.
- mistermann 8y ago> From what I see, the problem isn't so much with the truth, but rather the narrative and interpretation of these facts. Exactly. > For example, suppose a vaccine had a 90% success rate. This is the truth, however anti-vaxxers will focus on the 10% failure rate. And pro-vaxxers will "focus" (ie: discuss that, and only that) the success rate. But if you don't cover up the 10% and someone finds out, this is how "conspiracy theories" get started.