3 ms·
In many ways, "history" has changed with revelations from the CIAs actions in Iran, Reagans actions in Iran (before and after), and more, especially to those of
by smileysteve 8y ago
In many ways, "history" has changed with revelations from the CIAs actions in Iran, Reagans actions in Iran (before and after), and more, especially to those of us reading instead of basing it on partisan hackery.
Perhaps one of the better statements we can most accurately make is that his administration was pretty poor at covering things up, spinning - perhaps to the extent of lacking the confidence Americans required.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/05/books/review/president-carter-stuart-eizenstat.html https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/05/books/review/president-ca...
- 0xcde4c3db 8y ago> especially to those of us reading instead of basing it on partisan hackery And make no mistake: the partisan hackery is strong in criticism (more commonly, vacuous dismissal) of Carter. I know a Republican who calls him "that man", a la FDR's detractors.