4 ms·
I'm assuming this is because of growth and decay between fill and release cycles. But in the long run wouldn't that be carbon neutral?
by your-nanny 8y ago
I'm assuming this is because of growth and decay between fill and release cycles. But in the long run wouldn't that be carbon neutral?
- acidburnNSA 8y agoNot a true expert on the topic but from my reading it sounds like land is generally a carbon sink and water produces carbon so when you turn land into water, the net effect is additional carbon. Estimates have man-made reservoirs accounting for 0.5% of the total anthropogenic carbon emissions worldwide; fairly significant when we're considering the scale needed for energy storage with wind (blows 35% of the time, US avg.) and solar (shines 25% of the time, US avg.). http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/739881515751628436/pdf/122610-WP-PUBLIC-WFinalApplicationFilesWeBookW.pdf http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/739881515751628436...
- strommen 8y agoIt's carbon neutral when plants decay to carbon dioxide. But they need oxygen for this to happen - and when they don't (like when they're underwater), they decay to methane. And methane is a greenhouse gas 20-80x more potent than carbon dioxide.