> More importantly, we do not have a clear standarn on what qualifies as a "religion". And for, I think obvious reasons, that is a line we don't really want to

> More importantly, we do not have a clear standarn on what qualifies as a "religion". And for, I think obvious reasons, that is a line we don't really want to draw. Some standard does and must exist, even if it's not clearly defined. Sincerity of belief is a reasonable benchmark, I think, since religions are systems of belief. Otherwise, nearly any set of axioms can be considered a religion, and if everything is a religion, nothing is.