5 ms·
"I'm not prepared to handle 10 guys mugging me as I walk home,but that isn't my goal." Muggings have an understandable statistical distribution, which allows y
by jeffdavis 8y ago
"I'm not prepared to handle 10 guys mugging me as I walk home,but that isn't my goal."
Muggings have an understandable statistical distribution, which allows you to take a calculated risk.
It's impossible to calculate the risk of software security problems, and almost by definition the problems are less contained than you think.
Will the next secuirty breach hurt a few individuals, destroy the business, or hurt the entire country or the entire world?
- badrabbit 8y agoThat's what security professionals do. We measure risk and plan for the next breach. I used that as an example,but in security we can measure the risk of a specific data or system being compromised. We can define specific security posture requirements that can be met. Incident response plans account for recovery and cost-efficient remediation of the next breach. Extensive IR playbooks can be defined for when software security fails. Acheiving security means being able to measure risk,place security controls,audits,policies and plan for IR. It does not mean elimination of vulnerabilities as a whole. Like you said,the next breach could impact the entire world, the problem is that the entire world as a whole is not prepared for it. More realistically,corporations are far more prepared than individuals. End users can't do their own computer security. Unfortunately this can only be fixed by regulation, and that can only happen when people are scared enough. But even then, people don't understand technology enough to demand such regulation. In my opinion,silicon valley's political involvement would be a roadblock since it will inevitably get perceived as a liberals vs conservatives issue. I hope technologists become more socio-politically neutral just for that readon.