3 ms·
> > your final verdict is that it is harmless. > No. My final verdict is that it is not "denying the right to exist". You disagree that it’s harmless... does
by mcphage 8y ago
> > your final verdict is that it is harmless.
> No. My final verdict is that it is not "denying the right to exist".
You disagree that it’s harmless... does that mean you consider such speech harmful? Does it constitute harm?
- mpweiher 8y agoReading comprehension? I disagreed with "your final verdict is that it is harmless" Because my "verdict" was that it is not "denying the right to exist". I also said the language was "despicable" and "crude", all of which I can do without knowing whether or not it is harmful, on which I haven't said anything. See also "So you're saying": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmYvjt5lGX0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmYvjt5lGX0
- mcphage 8y agoFair enough, so I’m asking: do you think it is harmless or harmful?