> For speech to be powerful it requires the consent/cooperation of the spoken-to This is where you are wrong. You already admitted that there are involuntary

> For speech to be powerful it requires the consent/cooperation of the spoken-to This is where you are wrong. You already admitted that there are involuntary aspects of speech processing, and this is a step in the right direction. Your mistake is dismissing how powerful these involuntary aspects are, and this mistake probably stems from your irrational faith in human agency despite all odds.