3 ms·

Sure, however I really like to see what downvoters have to say. The "power management is bad" is pretty generic, isn't it? High-end laptop lines (Dell, HP, Len

Sure, however I really like to see what downvoters have to say. The "power management is bad" is pretty generic, isn't it? High-end laptop lines (Dell, HP, Lenovo) have actually pretty good linux support, they are almost always intel i5+ cpus with integrated graphics which are all very similar. There is next to zero setup required in almost any case. This is known. The drivers are tried and tested. I've never experienced any random "power management issue". Suspend/resume/battery consumption/acpi is working perfectly fine. What else does qualify for "power managment"?? I've been supporting a team of 20+ people with these lines in a mixed environment, and linux since more than a decade was always basically plug and play. There have been some quirks in some models, which generally required some tweaks in the kernel boot line, to fix issues with backlight tweaking.

mwcampbell 8y ago
> High-end laptop lines Sure, but Linux really ought to shine on the low-end laptops.
- polkadotted 8y ago
  Linux shines also on low-end laptops as long as you're still decent hardware. Nowdays it's still generally an intel core with integrated graphics, memory and I/O controller, so the result will be pretty much the same. Old, good laptops work even better than brand new editions of current laptop lines. But this doesn't save you from crappy hardware, which is why this kind of argument is a non-starter for me. How well does current windows editions work on low-end crappy laptops that sell for the lowest tier? Not great. These laptops have plenty of little issues on windows as well. Maybe better than linux, because the drivers have way more work-arounds than linux has. Have you ever seen the internal linux quirks table to work around buggy and downright horrid hardware? That's what you get with those. If it works at all is thanks to the patience of people that put in the time to work those issues around. I frankly do not blame linux if it doesn't work well with such hardware.

mwcampbell 8y ago

> High-end laptop lines Sure, but Linux really ought to shine on the low-end laptops.

polkadotted 8y ago
Linux shines also on low-end laptops as long as you're still decent hardware. Nowdays it's still generally an intel core with integrated graphics, memory and I/O controller, so the result will be pretty much the same. Old, good laptops work even better than brand new editions of current laptop lines. But this doesn't save you from crappy hardware, which is why this kind of argument is a non-starter for me. How well does current windows editions work on low-end crappy laptops that sell for the lowest tier? Not great. These laptops have plenty of little issues on windows as well. Maybe better than linux, because the drivers have way more work-arounds than linux has. Have you ever seen the internal linux quirks table to work around buggy and downright horrid hardware? That's what you get with those. If it works at all is thanks to the patience of people that put in the time to work those issues around. I frankly do not blame linux if it doesn't work well with such hardware.