4 ms·
The idea that it's difficult to self-host these open source solutions is often part of the marketing but it often isn't true. Many times, I've seen companies ho
by jondubois 8y ago
The idea that it's difficult to self-host these open source solutions is often part of the marketing but it often isn't true. Many times, I've seen companies host their own HTTP servers but outsource their WebSocket servers even though they don't require much additional DevOps skills if they used the right open source tools.
Often, those companies would actually have benefited from being able to integrate their backend systems more closely.
Regarding back end services; I've used various Amazon AWS services at different companies and, every time, it made development and deployment way more complicated - For example, one corporation I worked at, there was only 1 person in the whole company who had the full knowledge to work with our Lambda setup; this person worked very slowly (probably not their fault) so they were blocking all other teams in the company. It would have been much faster if the company operated the server themselves.
- jondubois 8y agoBig for-profit companies have always been marketing against open source software; before, they would say that because it's free; it means that it's insecure and low quality. Because it's now obvious that this is not true, for-profit companies have resorted to focusing their marketing on the idea that it's "too much effort to manage and scale" open source software.
- user5994461 8y ago>>> they would say that because it's free; it means that it's insecure and low quality. It's not free, it costs money to setup and keep running. It's also often abandoned and unmaintained.