3 ms·
"up to 160 million operations per second" Read operations? Write operations? Per core, or using N cores? For the case of one core at 3GHz, it would mean 20 CP
by faragon 8y ago
"up to 160 million operations per second"
Read operations? Write operations? Per core, or using N cores?
For the case of one core at 3GHz, it would mean 20 CPU cycles per operation, which is barely enough for storing the data in the RAM for a log write. If using more than one core, e.g. one for writing the log, and others for updating the actual data structures, could imply much longer times for completing one operation, despite doing 160M per second on average: in that case it would not their "faster" would mean scalable rather than faster.