> They then tested against only different configurations of themselves for configurations that hit disk. In the case of Redis, AFAIK it can't support larger th

> They then tested against only different configurations of themselves for configurations that hit disk. In the case of Redis, AFAIK it can't support larger than memory use cases, right? And in fact they do compare to RocksDB for larger-than-memory, see Fig 10. Granted, it could be more detailed, but I think it makes their point.