3 ms·
I wish I could do this justice in one post. The whole thing is like a snake swallowing its own tail. If what "they" are saying is correct, then this is "my" dr
by monktastic1 8y ago
I wish I could do this justice in one post.
The whole thing is like a snake swallowing its own tail. If what "they" are saying is correct, then this is "my" dream. The Buddha is a character I dreamed up to remind me how to wake up.
Why isn't this solipsism? First, because it's not my personal dream (the person being a character himself). Second, for a similar reason as MWI is not solipsism. This branch really is my own branch (in a particular sense). What I experience as other people are really "my versions" of them, but this does not mean there aren't other perspectives analogous to mine.
This idealist perspective can be made internally consistent. At that point, deciding between it and materialism may seem like a matter of preference. The difference is that the idealist perspective can be confirmed, in the same way that a nighttime dream can be: you discover, very precisely, how you constructed the whole thing, including all the tricks you used to blind yourself to the ruse.
- Eliezer 8y agoOkay, but if you thought it was all your dream, why would you write up that belief in a presumed attempt to communicate the same idea to another figment of your imagination?
- monktastic1 8y agoIn a dream, it's possible to gain and lose lucidity repeatedly, and in varying degrees. In the "breaks," one concocts all kinds of nonsensical strategies to regain it. I suppose one of mine is arguing with others about the nature of consciousness and its relationship to QM. In the best case, other people catch on and contribute missing pieces of the puzzle, which alleviates remaining doubts that were dissuading me from pursuing it in earnest.