So maybe, just maybe, there isn't a thing such as "best general" and to try to create such a title is a misguided viewpoint on history. Not everything has a be

So maybe, just maybe, there isn't a thing such as "best general" and to try to create such a title is a misguided viewpoint on history. Not everything has a best or worst. This kind of reductionist thinking is wrong. If it's something like a "just for fun" project sure fine, but this is not the way to evaluate wars and peoples.