3 ms·
> I think this would depend on what you consider liberalism. For instance, I think two of the most important components of liberalism are the autonomy of the in
by shard972 8y ago
> I think this would depend on what you consider liberalism. For instance, I think two of the most important components of liberalism are the autonomy of the individual and the consent of the governed.
I would say these two aspects definitially are hallmarks of liberalism.
Your next steps go down a libertarian or "right" path but if we were to add to our bucket of values some form of egalitarianism, which is quite common amongst those on the "left" or "progressive/socialist" you would end up going down a completely different path of conclusions.
In the end you would still both be operating under the pretense of liberalism, but i'm sure there would be disagreements about who is truly being liberal :P
- TangoTrotFox 8y agoI can clearly see how one ideology could be seen as operating under a pretense of liberalism, at least given the hallmarks we've mentioned. How do you think the government (or at least the segment of government) I've described would also be considered to be operating under pretense?