5 ms·

Google’s censored search engine could actually help Chinese citizens

31 points by shard972 8y ago

sidibe 8y ago
Why do people assume China will be OK with Google notifying users results are censored? China can make arbitrary changes to their rules at any time and force Google go along or go home. Google is free of this pressure by not participating but the more revenue they have in China the tougher it will be to say no.
- mavdi 8y ago
  Yeah this article's reasoning is some next level BS. Of course Google will bend it's western norms and policies to whatever the Chinese demand. Even more so after entering China, they wouldn't simply decide not to comply and pack their bags writing off billions in investment.
  - pas 8y ago
    They already did so once, which is not something other tech companies are able to say. I don't have very high hopes of Google somehow breaking Chinese censorship, but simply writing off their effort seems unfair.
    - ardy42 8y ago
      > but simply writing off their effort seems unfair. Their efforts seem obviously futile, and open up the risk that the Chinese government will use it's new leverage over them to get them to to bad things. For instance, Yahoo once handed over the emails of two Chinese pro-democracy journalists [1], resulting in them getting 10 year prison sentences in China. Once Google is getting revenue from China, it will be a lot harder for them to say no such demands, especially ones they can comply with in secret. [1] https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=3862513&page=1 https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=3862513&page=1
    - throwaway820189 8y ago
      I remember another poster saying they did not completely leave. They still had offices in China that focused on Adwords and other businesses in China, just not search. Google announced they were leaving not because of censorship, but due to Gmail hacking. What I wonder is if China has a similar law like the US that let's them issue "National Security Letters" with secret gag orders. If they did, then they shouldn't have needed to hack Gmail in the first place.
    - zelon88 8y ago
      What makes you so convinced that breaking Chinese censorship is in Google's best interest? What makes you convinced that they have any responsibility to do any amount of good to anyone? Google stands to gain a monopoly in the largest market on Earth by signing a deal with China. They stand to lose the largest market on Earth with no chance of ever competing in it if they stab China in the back. They will do nothing to "break" censorship. Doing no evil isn't even in their mission statement anymore, so starting a civil war over free speech certainly isn't on their radar. Google wants market share. They want more GBs of personal data that they can use to profile the human race and target ads to the right people. The only concern about well-being in any of this is Google being concerned that their own employees will turn this into a media fiasco, which it slowly is becoming.
- yorwba 8y ago
  > Why do people assume China will be OK with Google notifying users results are censored? That's what Bing does, and China seems to be OK with it. It's also what WeChat does when an article published on their platform is censored. (Censored chat messages disappear without a trace, though.) Of course the rules could change at any moment, but it currently doesn't seem like the government cares very much about people knowing that everything is censored.
jackhack 8y ago
Tacit acceptance of censorship -- is this the logical destination of "don't be evil?" As if the Chinese people don't deserve truth and dignity; basic human rights. Along this spectrum of logic we would also argue that the North Korean "internet" is a good thing, as is all controlled media and news, too. I find it repugnant to see the people in relatively free Western nations pull the ladder up after them; as if others don't deserve what we have (but now obviously take for granted). That's a form of soft bigotry. A condescending pat on the head and a tut-tutting, as if the simple people of China couldn't handle freedom and/or don't want it. The Tiananmen Square Massacre wasn't all that long ago, so we know that the latter is not true. Obviously this decision is driven by money -- access to markets -- but what else? What is the ideology that makes this acceptable and justifiable in their minds, because I cannot understand it. "Do you participate, or do you stand on the sideline and yell at how things should be?" -- Tim Cook Partnering with evil is evil. Empowering evil is evil. As is ignoring it. Does anyone doubt that a report of all searchers for forbidden knowledge will be generated and turned over to Chinese leadership for "followup"? But there's undoubtedly a lot of money to be made so what do I know.
- sigmar 8y ago
  >As if the Chinese people don't deserve truth and dignity; basic human rights. Their internet is already censored. This is the question of whether Baidu is doing the censorship of search results or Google is.
  - deleted 8y ago
    [deleted]
  - forkerenok 8y ago
    I'd argue it still counts as contribution to curtailment of the mentioned rights. As it was mentioned before, presence of Google will add legitimacy to the practice of censorship in China (and not only in China). My toy conspiracy theory is that China is inviting foreign giants on its own terms to deface them. That in turn will level appearance of their products with those of Chinese companies in some global markets (e.g. b2b software).
torgian 8y ago
Bullshit article. Apparently the author doesnt know what “authoritative government “ means. All the Chinese government would need to do is fine google, and pull the plug on google. Simple as that. When it comes to China’s censorship laws, it’s very hard to overcome them if damn near impossible. And quite frankly, most Chinese citizens could care less. Baidu and other services gives them what they need. Those who care get a VPN, and that includes Chinese businesses. Author has never stepped foot in china or talked to its people. Google doesn’t stand a chance if they go against censorship laws, and they know it. They don’t care.
- blacksmith_tb 8y ago
  I don't know what "authoritative government" means either... was that supposed to be "authoritarian"? I am not sure I follow the argument, though - yes, it's true that the Beijing could just pull the plug on Google Lite(tm), but there would be some international PR damage. I doubt it would stop them, but it would at least influence the decision. But I do agree that the overall sense I get of Chinese citizens is not that they are chafing at the level of control they live under, it's all bread and circuses, cashless WeChat fun.
crazynick4 8y ago
I'm surprised to see as liberal a paper as The Washington Post supporting this. Or really any news source coming out of a democracy.
- dgacmu 8y ago
  Really? There's a fundamental and very uncertain question here about isolation vs partial engagement that plays out in all sorts of international relations. The discussion above captures it well enough. I personally have absolutely no idea what the best answer is, and I'd be surprised if most if the other readers here do either. For a. Example of the engagement question, see the Golden Arches theory (and disagreement): https://mediawiki.middlebury.edu/wiki/IPE/Golden_Arches_Theory_of_Conflict_Prevention https://mediawiki.middlebury.edu/wiki/IPE/Golden_Arches_Theo...
chubasco 8y ago
I think it is ironic that Google et al like to point out when governments are asking them to censor something, but make no mention of when they themselves are censoring something. "Governments are the real bad guys here. Trust us."

31 points by shard972 8y ago

Why do people assume China will be OK with Google notifying users results are censored? China can make arbitrary changes to their rules at any time and force Google go along or go home. Google is free of this pressure by not participating but the more revenue they have in China the tougher it will be to say no.

mavdi 8y ago
Yeah this article's reasoning is some next level BS. Of course Google will bend it's western norms and policies to whatever the Chinese demand. Even more so after entering China, they wouldn't simply decide not to comply and pack their bags writing off billions in investment.
- pas 8y ago
  They already did so once, which is not something other tech companies are able to say. I don't have very high hopes of Google somehow breaking Chinese censorship, but simply writing off their effort seems unfair.
  - ardy42 8y ago
    > but simply writing off their effort seems unfair. Their efforts seem obviously futile, and open up the risk that the Chinese government will use it's new leverage over them to get them to to bad things. For instance, Yahoo once handed over the emails of two Chinese pro-democracy journalists [1], resulting in them getting 10 year prison sentences in China. Once Google is getting revenue from China, it will be a lot harder for them to say no such demands, especially ones they can comply with in secret. [1] https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=3862513&page=1 https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=3862513&page=1
  - throwaway820189 8y ago
    I remember another poster saying they did not completely leave. They still had offices in China that focused on Adwords and other businesses in China, just not search. Google announced they were leaving not because of censorship, but due to Gmail hacking. What I wonder is if China has a similar law like the US that let's them issue "National Security Letters" with secret gag orders. If they did, then they shouldn't have needed to hack Gmail in the first place.
  - zelon88 8y ago
    What makes you so convinced that breaking Chinese censorship is in Google's best interest? What makes you convinced that they have any responsibility to do any amount of good to anyone? Google stands to gain a monopoly in the largest market on Earth by signing a deal with China. They stand to lose the largest market on Earth with no chance of ever competing in it if they stab China in the back. They will do nothing to "break" censorship. Doing no evil isn't even in their mission statement anymore, so starting a civil war over free speech certainly isn't on their radar. Google wants market share. They want more GBs of personal data that they can use to profile the human race and target ads to the right people. The only concern about well-being in any of this is Google being concerned that their own employees will turn this into a media fiasco, which it slowly is becoming.
yorwba 8y ago
> Why do people assume China will be OK with Google notifying users results are censored? That's what Bing does, and China seems to be OK with it. It's also what WeChat does when an article published on their platform is censored. (Censored chat messages disappear without a trace, though.) Of course the rules could change at any moment, but it currently doesn't seem like the government cares very much about people knowing that everything is censored.

jackhack 8y ago

Tacit acceptance of censorship -- is this the logical destination of "don't be evil?" As if the Chinese people don't deserve truth and dignity; basic human rights. Along this spectrum of logic we would also argue that the North Korean "internet" is a good thing, as is all controlled media and news, too. I find it repugnant to see the people in relatively free Western nations pull the ladder up after them; as if others don't deserve what we have (but now obviously take for granted). That's a form of soft bigotry. A condescending pat on the head and a tut-tutting, as if the simple people of China couldn't handle freedom and/or don't want it. The Tiananmen Square Massacre wasn't all that long ago, so we know that the latter is not true. Obviously this decision is driven by money -- access to markets -- but what else? What is the ideology that makes this acceptable and justifiable in their minds, because I cannot understand it. "Do you participate, or do you stand on the sideline and yell at how things should be?" -- Tim Cook Partnering with evil is evil. Empowering evil is evil. As is ignoring it. Does anyone doubt that a report of all searchers for forbidden knowledge will be generated and turned over to Chinese leadership for "followup"? But there's undoubtedly a lot of money to be made so what do I know.

sigmar 8y ago
>As if the Chinese people don't deserve truth and dignity; basic human rights. Their internet is already censored. This is the question of whether Baidu is doing the censorship of search results or Google is.
- deleted 8y ago
  [deleted]
- forkerenok 8y ago
  I'd argue it still counts as contribution to curtailment of the mentioned rights. As it was mentioned before, presence of Google will add legitimacy to the practice of censorship in China (and not only in China). My toy conspiracy theory is that China is inviting foreign giants on its own terms to deface them. That in turn will level appearance of their products with those of Chinese companies in some global markets (e.g. b2b software).

torgian 8y ago

Bullshit article. Apparently the author doesnt know what “authoritative government “ means. All the Chinese government would need to do is fine google, and pull the plug on google. Simple as that. When it comes to China’s censorship laws, it’s very hard to overcome them if damn near impossible. And quite frankly, most Chinese citizens could care less. Baidu and other services gives them what they need. Those who care get a VPN, and that includes Chinese businesses. Author has never stepped foot in china or talked to its people. Google doesn’t stand a chance if they go against censorship laws, and they know it. They don’t care.

blacksmith_tb 8y ago
I don't know what "authoritative government" means either... was that supposed to be "authoritarian"? I am not sure I follow the argument, though - yes, it's true that the Beijing could just pull the plug on Google Lite(tm), but there would be some international PR damage. I doubt it would stop them, but it would at least influence the decision. But I do agree that the overall sense I get of Chinese citizens is not that they are chafing at the level of control they live under, it's all bread and circuses, cashless WeChat fun.

crazynick4 8y ago

I'm surprised to see as liberal a paper as The Washington Post supporting this. Or really any news source coming out of a democracy.

dgacmu 8y ago
Really? There's a fundamental and very uncertain question here about isolation vs partial engagement that plays out in all sorts of international relations. The discussion above captures it well enough. I personally have absolutely no idea what the best answer is, and I'd be surprised if most if the other readers here do either. For a. Example of the engagement question, see the Golden Arches theory (and disagreement): https://mediawiki.middlebury.edu/wiki/IPE/Golden_Arches_Theory_of_Conflict_Prevention https://mediawiki.middlebury.edu/wiki/IPE/Golden_Arches_Theo...

chubasco 8y ago

I think it is ironic that Google et al like to point out when governments are asking them to censor something, but make no mention of when they themselves are censoring something. "Governments are the real bad guys here. Trust us."