Well, since the repo more or less took the contents verbatim from the original author (unless they are the same), and here presents it _more_ clearly than the o

Well, since the repo more or less took the contents verbatim from the original author (unless they are the same), and here presents it _more_ clearly than the original, I'd say the repo owner failed. At the very least it should be presented in a more unmaintainable way. Edit, apparently repo owner already checked with author: https://github.com/Droogans/unmaintainable-code/issues/3 https://github.com/Droogans/unmaintainable-code/issues/3 :+1: