You can't think of any way to make money by using hype to corral municipal transit contracts? You don't consider it a con to generate the hype with social medi

You can't think of any way to make money by using hype to corral municipal transit contracts? You don't consider it a con to generate the hype with social media instead of ever, ever subjecting the product to competitive bidding processes? The implied question here is "would LA let an actual civil engineering firm dig a hole under the city as a proof of concept" and the answer is a pretty firm "of course not." I think "con" is a cynical and slightly disingenuous way to describe this project. I'd probably go with "stunt" or something else, but I can absolutely understand the perspective that could drive this negative opinion.