You're aware of how Masterpiece was ruled, correct? It seems that you're implying that Masterpiece was found to be acting in accordance to the law, but that's n

You're aware of how Masterpiece was ruled, correct? It seems that you're implying that Masterpiece was found to be acting in accordance to the law, but that's not what the ruling was based on or addressed at all. The Supreme Court found that Colorado didn't give enough respect or credence to the owner's religious beliefs. The owner's religious beliefs being openly mocked by a Colorado Civil Rights Board member was used as an example. The board was found to not have worked under the assumption of religious neutrality. For those reasons, the case was found in his favor. The Supreme Court did not at all rule on whether or not it was legal for Masterpiece Cakeshop to deny his gay patrons the cake they wanted. They made no decision on whether it was within the owner's first amendment rights to deny service, or if what happened was denial of service. Hope this helps.