3 ms·
"Unions are incentivized to bargain for as much compensation as possible" Yes, they are. And companies are incentivized to bargain for as much profit and as li
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
"Unions are incentivized to bargain for as much compensation as possible"
Yes, they are. And companies are incentivized to bargain for as much profit and as little employee compensation as possible, yet people here seem to consider that a moral imperative. I cannot, and will not begrudge unions for trying to get the best deal for their members while that is the case.
- fbonetti 8y agoThe problem isn't so much that unions are incentivized to bargain for as much as possible. Every one who participates in the economy is trying to get the best deal for themselves. The problem is that politicians aren't restrained by cost. If a union demands that hole diggers be paid $100 an hour instead of $10 an hour, a politician will gladly give it to them even if it will bankrupt the state. Edit: I think I should note that I'm specifically referring to unionized government workers.
- s73v3r_ 8y agoThat's entirely wrong; those politicians are still accountable to the voters.
- aeternus 8y ago>companies are incentivized to bargain for as much profit and as little employee compensation as possible Not necessarily, especially when employees are in high demand. Netflix has done quite well by paying employees well above average in order to effectively have their pick of the talent. Paying employees poorly can increase training costs, recruiting costs, cause negative customer perception, etc.