2 ms·
According to this article[0] that's unlikely. It looks like Mastodon is engaged in the same sort of blocking behavior Twitter is. I think it's more likely we'l
by lylecubed 8y ago
According to this article[0] that's unlikely. It looks like Mastodon is engaged in the same sort of blocking behavior Twitter is.
I think it's more likely we'll see private, invite-only services take off instead.
[0]: https://hackernoon.com/mastodon-is-dead-in-the-water-888c10e8abb1 https://hackernoon.com/mastodon-is-dead-in-the-water-888c10e...
- parliament32 8y agoThat's a half-truth: Mastadon itself can't and won't block anything. In the Mastadon network, users live on instances which all talk to each other. Each instance can choose to block any other instance. If a user doesn't like their instance's policies, they can join another instance with less, different, or no blocks. Alternatively, a technical user can run their own instance and federate with other instances from there. Your linked article claims, "running and administering your own social server is friggin’ expensive". This isn't true: a $5/month VPS can easily host a Mastadon instance for a dozen users, and requires less than a few minutes of administration per month.