4 ms·
Maybe this perception exists because there is less for NASA to do. There's not a lot for astronauts to do in space until we have some kind of breakthrough in p
by bluesnowmonkey 16y ago
Maybe this perception exists because there is less for NASA to do. There's not a lot for astronauts to do in space until we have some kind of breakthrough in propulsion. It's too slow and expensive to get around the solar system until then.
So for now we put up satellites and telescopes, send out probes, help with the ISS, and... study the sky. These jobs get done with what we have now. What great mission would even require the kind of NASA that existed in the 60s? Please don't say Mars.
- ars 16y agoI agree. NASA, and most people, thrive on having a mission - especially a challenge.
- waterlesscloud 16y agoWhy not say Mars?
- krakensden 16y agoThere's no point, other than flag planting.