4 ms·
And then increase it again by arguing that AT&T should never have made it possible for employees to do this.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
And then increase it again by arguing that AT&T should never have made it possible for employees to do this.
- evgen 8y agoAnd then diminish it to zero again because yes it should be possible for employees to do that. The economic value for most people of being locked out of your phone number and not being able to easily fix the problem or easily upgrade a phone exceeds the cost imposed when some of those people are morons and assume ability to receive an SMS message sent to a particular phone number is any sort of security factor.
- s73v3r_ 8y ago"And then diminish it to zero again because yes it should be possible for employees to do that." Absolutely not. It never should be possible for a single employee to do that with no checks at all.
- bdcravens 8y agoAccountability yes, but holding them responsible for what their service was used for is a slippery slope.
- s73v3r_ 8y agoI don't think so. Their service was used to steal someone's phone account, which was then used to steal someone's money.