3 ms·
> This article is, ahem, not credible. It isn't "credible" because you don't like that the Whistleblower reported it to their own agencies watchdog instead of
by Someone1234 8y ago
> This article is, ahem, not credible.
It isn't "credible" because you don't like that the Whistleblower reported it to their own agencies watchdog instead of another agency? I don't follow what that has to do with the article's credibility at all...
- zaroth 8y agoPer the article the “whistleblower” reported nothing at all to the authorities.
- tanderson92 8y agoIt isn't credible because the IRS IG has nothing to do with securities law and so they aren't the proper authorities. A simple read of their website shows it exclusively has to do with proper application of internal revenue code.
- oxide 8y agoFair enough. I don't put a lot of stock in the SEC anyway, a 'who watches the watchers' lack of ironclad faith in these regulatory agencies tends to afflict me. That said, all credit to them when they do enforce.