3 ms·
That's a situation created by Congress, not federal agencies. Federal agencies with dire needs for high demand/high pay skills would love nothing more than to
by GVIrish 8y ago
That's a situation created by Congress, not federal agencies. Federal agencies with dire needs for high demand/high pay skills would love nothing more than to be able to hire full-time employees at market rates but it is very difficult for them to do so because of the federal pay scale and hiring guidelines.
It's part of the whole charade of smaller government. The number of actual government employees is reduced but then the government pays contracting companies 2x or 3x (or more) for contractors and ends up with same number of butts in seats.
- mikec3010 8y ago> but then the government pays... That's my point. They have the money, but something-something..."policy"...something-something.... It goes to corporations instead of people.
- qaq 8y agoWho are "they" in this case? If you think there is broad electoral support for removing government pay caps I have a bridge to sell you :).
- mikec3010 8y agoThe same "they" you are referring to. The ones writing the checks. I don't care about the precise technicality that enables wage suppression. I literally don't care. The constitution also says no spying on Americans, but somehow that precise word of law was elided. The bottom line is: they have billions, they suppress wages for employees, and they enrich billion dollar contracting firms. Nothing I claim is untrue.
- qaq 8y agoYes that technicality is called democracy oh well