4 ms·
Reading through the responses here, is seems that we're forgetting a. Torvalds' well known demeanor, and b. that he's protecting linux. Yes, he's unpleasant m
by redleggedfrog 8y ago
Reading through the responses here, is seems that we're forgetting a. Torvalds' well known demeanor, and b. that he's protecting linux.
Yes, he's unpleasant much of the time. But he has to be. Imaging if he doesn't take this hard line and something broken worms its way into linux. You know how grumpy he's going to be when he sees the headline "Gajillions of linux servers suffer random lock-ups" on Hacker News?
He doesn't have the luxury of suffering fools. I'm generally considered a nice person - if you put me in charge of linux, it'd be a mess.
- ranko 8y agoHe doesn't have the luxury of accepting bad pull requests. I don't agree that this means he has to be abrasive or abusive.
- jelly 8y agoArguably it reduces his workload. If you're terse and abrasive people will try to spend less time talking to you except when absolutely necessary, which frees up more time for reviewing and writing patches.