4 ms·

I don't understand why aren't they forbidden from selling that shit.

simontc 8y ago
The Trump administration just allowed the usage of asbestos. I don't think there is a chance of getting a Monsanto product banned.
- votepaunchy 8y ago
  “A little background: In 1989, the EPA tried to ban asbestos outright, under a 1976 law called the Toxic Substances Control Act. The phased prohibition was overturned by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in 1991, and the agency succeeded in halting only six then-obsolete uses of asbestos, including corrugated paper and flooring felt. So the June rule ensures that any U.S. companies who want to use asbestos in all its nonbanned uses—products like reinforced plastics, millboard, floor tiles, and roofing felt—are subject to EPA review. As the EPA points out, without the June rule, any company could start importing or processing asbestos for floor tiles whenever it wanted. (Note: You can still comment on this rule through the Federal eRulemaking Portal until Friday.)” https://slate.com/business/2018/08/the-trump-administration-is-not-bringing-back-asbestos.html https://slate.com/business/2018/08/the-trump-administration-...
- tr0ut 8y ago
  Please stop repeating this. Its just not completely accurate. I keep hearing it from people. First asbestos has been in use for a long time. Still to this day before anything to do with Trump. What has been happening is the number of companies that produce or use it have greatly declined. Due to legal issues. Second not all asbestos is created equal. Some of the fibers are completely save for there intended purpose. There are many studies that argue claims that it is the direct cause of illness. We really don't know. The people at the greatest risk and I'm sure this risk is universal for such materials. Are the ones working with it on a daily basis. I have nothing to do with asbestos nor did I vote for Trump. But the knee-jerk reaction does nothing to inform anyone of reality.
s21n 8y ago
Probably because it's not toxic or cancerogenic in the quantities that it is used. It's less toxic (LD50) than table salt. There's no evidence that the glyphosate residues in food could cause cancer. It's even much safer for farmers than many other pesticides, despite the fact that farmers get in contact with much greater quantities. It's not linked to cancer in farmers, except in case of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, but even this link is weak, and debatable at least: https://plantoutofplace.com/2018/08/glyphosate-and-cancer-revisited/ https://plantoutofplace.com/2018/08/glyphosate-and-cancer-re...
masto 8y ago
Because there's nothing wrong with it.
harryh 8y ago
You don't understand this because you have no understanding of the science behind food safety. If you were more educated about this sort of thing your understanding would improve.

The Trump administration just allowed the usage of asbestos. I don't think there is a chance of getting a Monsanto product banned.

votepaunchy 8y ago
“A little background: In 1989, the EPA tried to ban asbestos outright, under a 1976 law called the Toxic Substances Control Act. The phased prohibition was overturned by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in 1991, and the agency succeeded in halting only six then-obsolete uses of asbestos, including corrugated paper and flooring felt. So the June rule ensures that any U.S. companies who want to use asbestos in all its nonbanned uses—products like reinforced plastics, millboard, floor tiles, and roofing felt—are subject to EPA review. As the EPA points out, without the June rule, any company could start importing or processing asbestos for floor tiles whenever it wanted. (Note: You can still comment on this rule through the Federal eRulemaking Portal until Friday.)” https://slate.com/business/2018/08/the-trump-administration-is-not-bringing-back-asbestos.html https://slate.com/business/2018/08/the-trump-administration-...
tr0ut 8y ago
Please stop repeating this. Its just not completely accurate. I keep hearing it from people. First asbestos has been in use for a long time. Still to this day before anything to do with Trump. What has been happening is the number of companies that produce or use it have greatly declined. Due to legal issues. Second not all asbestos is created equal. Some of the fibers are completely save for there intended purpose. There are many studies that argue claims that it is the direct cause of illness. We really don't know. The people at the greatest risk and I'm sure this risk is universal for such materials. Are the ones working with it on a daily basis. I have nothing to do with asbestos nor did I vote for Trump. But the knee-jerk reaction does nothing to inform anyone of reality.

s21n 8y ago

Probably because it's not toxic or cancerogenic in the quantities that it is used. It's less toxic (LD50) than table salt. There's no evidence that the glyphosate residues in food could cause cancer. It's even much safer for farmers than many other pesticides, despite the fact that farmers get in contact with much greater quantities. It's not linked to cancer in farmers, except in case of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, but even this link is weak, and debatable at least: https://plantoutofplace.com/2018/08/glyphosate-and-cancer-revisited/ https://plantoutofplace.com/2018/08/glyphosate-and-cancer-re...

masto 8y ago

Because there's nothing wrong with it.

harryh 8y ago

You don't understand this because you have no understanding of the science behind food safety. If you were more educated about this sort of thing your understanding would improve.