4 ms·
Not sure what you are saying. Can you clarify? They aren't proposing these numbers with any more context than the article, (This is a pilot running alongside e
by JauntyHatAngle 8y ago
Not sure what you are saying. Can you clarify?
They aren't proposing these numbers with any more context than the article, (This is a pilot running alongside existing infrastructure) so I'm really unsure about what you are asking?
- mozumder 8y agoI'm saying the numbers are so astronomically off that there is no viable path to profit without public subsidy, for any theoretical future system, big or small.
- SECProto 8y agoTheir path to profit is the Chicago airport loop, which is proposed to cost a fair bit more and have much more consistent ridership. This is a pilot project, a technology tester.
- CaptainZapp 8y agoThere is some disagreement among experts that this project is ever a path to profit, given that the projected construction cost is ridiculously low.[1] [1] https://www.citylab.com/transportation/2018/06/for-1-billion-elon-musks-tunnel-to-ohare-would-be-a-miracle/562841/ https://www.citylab.com/transportation/2018/06/for-1-billion...