4 ms·
Me neither. My own comments here on HN when the story broke were very positive and impressed for that very reason: it would have been a great feat, buying back
by dunpeal 8y ago
Me neither. My own comments here on HN when the story broke were very positive and impressed for that very reason: it would have been a great feat, buying back the company at 20% above than its present value, especially when he said early investors would have the option to stay in.
It seemed like such a great move, the only problem being how to raise such a huge amount of money. But then he tweeted "funding secured", so that's very solid... I mean, he's a CEO, he knows securities law, he would never post something like that without good reason, right...?
Now it just looks like one of his worst blunders. I believe most people don't even realize how bad it is yet. Based on all I'm reading, the SEC has a strong case, and so do the civil lawsuits.
I'm not a psychologist, but the more I think about it, the more it seems like the type of ego-driven blunder you can only make when you're surrounded by people who worship at your feet 24/7.
- coatmatter 8y agoIt's hard to tell whether something is too good to be true in these unusual news cycles and market conditions. The market wasn't sure either (not that the market is always rational but I digress). Not only does it now appear to be one of his worst blunders, but it appears to come after a series of self-inflicted blunders. I really thought the false "pedo" accusation was completely awful for someone of his apparent standing, but even that seems to pale in consequence to what could now be ahead. If he thought things were hard then, they've only just gotten 10 times harder than ever before now. All because of "one"* Tweet. * More than one Tweet really; there's a pattern of behaviour here.