2 ms·
Fine, here's another from Ronald Hensen at Delft: Experimental loophole-free violation of a Bell inequality using entangled electron spins separated by 1.3 km
by jmcmichael 8y ago
Fine, here's another from Ronald Hensen at Delft:
Experimental loophole-free violation of a Bell inequality using entangled electron spins separated by 1.3 km 2015
https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.05949v1 https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.05949v1
"...This result rules out large classes of local realist theories, and paves the way for implementing device-independent quantum-secure communication and randomness certification. "
- akvadrako 8y agoThis isn't relevant because Bohm's theory isn't local. There are much stronger results like PBR ruling out a large class of non-local realist theories, but that also doesn't include pilot wave theory. No known experiment can rule it out because it's predictions equal those of Copenhagen.
- thraway180306 8y agoThis is something different. Zeilinger paints himself disproving realism alone and has a well known philosophical stance/bias here. Local realism testing here however is about being both local and realist, and pilot waves aren't local to begin with.
- jmcmichael 8y agoYeah, that makes sense. Do you have an example of Zeilinger's writing where he discusses his philosophical stance? Is a philosophical stance something you believe that a physicist shouldn't have?