5 ms·
I agree. On the other hand, it is lowering mental effort required to study the topic, and that will probably not make every student more clever, maybe more lazy
by ttoinou 8y ago
I agree. On the other hand, it is lowering mental effort required to study the topic, and that will probably not make every student more clever, maybe more lazy, just waiting for the next youtube video to be told new stuff about maths instead of going research and study on its own.
- ryeguy_24 8y agoI think lowering the mental effort to learn something is a really good thing. It leaves room for more mental effort elsewhere.
- thanatropism 8y agoThe thing is that 80% of the usefulness of learning is that it's learning practice. This is why you sit for so much crap in K-12 -- you're learning how to learn. This rings even more true for techies who are always chasing a moving target (nonono, object-oriented CORBA RPC, nono, it's REST, it's Kernel SVM, it's Convolutional Networks....). The effort is (almost) the whole points. If you don't keep your learning organs stimulated they will literally wither and shrink.
- ryeguy_24 8y agoI agree with you but I don't think we should make things unnecessarily hard to understand if they aren't so. Do you? There will always be difficult things to learn out there but I don't think we shouldn't artificially make all things difficult if we don't have to.
- ttoinou 8y agowe should make things unnecessarily hard to understand if they aren't so Who said otherwise ? I am just saying that if you as a teacher are concerned about making people/students more clever, you need to think both at vulgarization but also at the meta level where they need to actually make mental effort to incorporate ideas, maths, methodology, calculus, visualization capabilities and in general self-motivation
- nightski 8y agoIf you consider the brain like a muscle, then "leaving mental effort for elsewhere" doesn't really make sense. If anything, it's making it more resilient for future work.