3 ms·
Nonsense. If you can't properly staff a location, then you close that location. What B&N has done is made a system-wide staffing reduction. So now busy stores h
by greedo 8y ago
Nonsense. If you can't properly staff a location, then you close that location. What B&N has done is made a system-wide staffing reduction. So now busy stores have fewer employees to help customers. This ends up hurting sales in all stores, ending in a death spiral.
B&N management has been incompetent for the better part of a decade; Riggio is mostly to blame since he can't seem to either delegate or let go.
- jeremymcanally 8y agoUnless they targeted higher numbers of experienced staff at said slow stores where their higher pay and experience didn't result in significantly higher sales and largely left experienced staff at busy stores in place. I have no clue if that's how it was done, but it isn't required to do this sort of reduction evenly across the entire business.
- greedo 8y agoThe firing of the receiving managers and other positions were system-wide. Didn't matter what the store sales were, they lost these positions. At the store near where I live, they often have only 4 employees working at a time, for a very busy location. One at the register, one at the Cafe, one manager, and one bookseller. So good luck if you get a large group of customers who don't want to wait 30 minutes to purchase their books, much less find them on the shelves. It's a death spiral...