5 ms·
Submission by "Professor of Computer Science, Princeton. Co-founder and CTO, Timescale."
by superdimwit 8y ago
Submission by "Professor of Computer Science, Princeton. Co-founder and CTO, Timescale."
- gbrown_ 8y agoFrom the article. > Yes, we are the developers of TimescaleDB, so you might quickly disregard our > comparison as biased. But if you let the analysis speak for itself, you’ll find > that it tries to stay objective — indeed, we report several scenarios below in > which InfluxDB outperforms TimescaleDB.
- a012 8y agoI've just read and 2/3 of this article shows TS has more advantage than InfluxDB. I just wonder why TS instead of just use PostgreSQL directly?
- akulkarni 8y ago(Timescaler here.) That's a common question, and one we address in this post: https://blog.timescale.com/timescaledb-vs-6a696248104e https://blog.timescale.com/timescaledb-vs-6a696248104e tl;dr TimescaleDB vs. PostgreSQL: 20x higher inserts, 2000x faster deletes, 1.2x-14,000x faster queries, additional functions for time-series analytics (e.g., first(), last(), time_bucket() [1]) [1] http://docs.timescale.com/v0.11/api#analytics http://docs.timescale.com/v0.11/api#analytics
- assface 8y agoMike Freedman is extra legit. There were rumors that he was going to be the 11th member of Wu Tang to replace ODB (RIP).