3 ms·
I would naively assume that with the huge number of POPs that Google has and the desire to provide a low latency service, Google would only need to have the que
by phicoh 8y ago
I would naively assume that with the huge number of POPs that Google has and the desire to provide a low latency service, Google would only need to have the queries that originate from their resolvers have the right local addresses.
What might be a problem is that for those addresses there is no geolocation information. Which Google could solve by supplying that to maxmind, etc.
Hence the need for the privacy violating subnet option.
- JdeBP 8y agoIt already does. There's a list of exactly that, supplied by Google, hyperlinked-to in the very article headlined here.