4 ms·
Wouldn't these branches be permanent? They might be fine for translations, but I doubt upstream would accept one for a bug fix. As for bookmarks, if I understa
by ciupicri 16y ago
Wouldn't these branches be permanent? They might be fine for translations, but I doubt upstream would accept one for a bug fix.
As for bookmarks, if I understand this correctly, I have to convince upstream to use them.
With git I can create a branch in my repository and upstream can pull my changes in whatever branch it wishes too. I don't need to convince anyone to do anything else, besides accepting my patches.
- tednaleid 16y agoSorry, I misunderstood your use case for the bug-fix branch. Yes, you likely wouldn't want a named branch for that. I use local bookmarks for this. It lets you think of it as a branch locally (it's really a floating tag), but doesn't (automatically) get pushed out.