5 ms·

mind elaborating a bit?

• icedchai 8y ago
  He's probably mad because with serverless, there are servers. You just have no control over them. "Serverless" is just "shared hosting" reinvented...
• nickik 8y ago
  There are still servers involved. Serverless sounds like its peer to peer. What it really is is VM less.
  • Drdrdrq 8y ago
    Well, as a developer I don't need to concern myself with servers, so in a way the term is fitting.
    • nickik 8y ago
      The interface it gives you is the functionality that the server provides. A server does not mean 'operating system'. you don't have to deal with the OS, but you still have you app running on the server.
  • collinmanderson 8y ago
    There's still a VM, too. Can we call it "stateless"? Because there's theoretically no server state between requests?