2 ms·
There's a rinse and repeat pattern of denial, suiting narratives here. Anti-feminists are covering their tracks by saying we live in a world that's already equ
by phjesusthatguy3 8y ago
There's a rinse and repeat pattern of denial, suiting narratives here.
Anti-feminists are covering their tracks by saying we live in a world that's already equally fair to women, which is obviously false. It happened with Adam, where believers distorted the meaning of "fall of man" to suit their narrative that it only applies to women separating men from their god. It's happened for ~2000 years, documented in the founding texts of the people now calling foul.
It's happening now, and it's not the last time. And just so you are aware, these narratives rely on the evisceration of science, logic, reason and well established definitions of words.
- writepub 8y agoNo one's claiming that we live in a world that's already equally fair to women. In fact, classic feminism - those espoused by Jordan Peterson and the like, are truly about uplifting women, where they aren't treated fairly. Modern feminism is in direct contrast to these founding prociples - it throws out science, reason and basic truths - in favor of unproven 'narratives'. Speaking of founding texts, God and religion, classic feminism fought for emancipation of religiously enforced garbs, head coverings, female genital mutilation, etc. Contrast that to modern feminism - where women with freedom to dress as they please don Hijabs in the name of 'freedom', while the actually oppressed women fighting the Hijab [1] are conveniently ignored. That my friend, is the evisceration of science, logic, reason and well established definitions of words - where women in the west with all the freedom do the bidding of oppressive men who cite religious text's demeaning reasons to cover one's head and body [1]: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-44040236 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-44040236