2 ms·
We're supposed to realize that it isn't a "fact". It's a study that has produced interesting results that point to something, but until more research is done,
by wccrawford 8y ago
We're supposed to realize that it isn't a "fact". It's a study that has produced interesting results that point to something, but until more research is done, it doesn't mean anything yet.
If that's your version of "negative", then yes, we should look negatively on it.
But more correctly, we should look skeptically on it. Just like all other studies that haven't been replicated scientifically.