3 ms·
This is something that I have been thinking about for a while, and I have implemented systems not requiring registration several times. In order to try to keep
by aarongough 16y ago
This is something that I have been thinking about for a while, and I have implemented systems not requiring registration several times.
In order to try to keep the quality of the content relatively high on those sites I also do some very simple statistical analysis on the text of each post/comment. It works very well! I've had one of the sites up for over a year and haven't had any real problems.
There is a Rails plugin that I wrote for implementing a comment system without registration here: http://github.com/aarongough/has_threaded_comments http://github.com/aarongough/has_threaded_comments
And that system integrates automatically with my system for doing statistical analysis on the text: http://github.com/aarongough/validates_text_content http://github.com/aarongough/validates_text_content
Examples of both in use can be seen at: http://whyiamangry.com/ http://whyiamangry.com/
- astrange 16y agoWhy do you have a pseudonym field for a one-off rant? If it's optional, why doesn't it say so? It doesn't add anything and just annoys people as they stop for a few seconds to type in "wtf" before continuing.
- aarongough 16y agoMainly so that people can establish an identity associated with their rants if they choose, many people seem to do this. Additionally it allows people to identify themselves as the OP when posting comments, and allows people to be more expressive by giving themselves a name to match their rant like 'AngryAtSuchAndSuch'. The pseudonym is not optional.