3 ms·
I kinda agree but think that you are overselling the signal generated. We have internal data that we can't discuss here that throws some doubt on the signal fro
by jasondclinton 8y ago
I kinda agree but think that you are overselling the signal generated. We have internal data that we can't discuss here that throws some doubt on the signal from whiteboard interviews of the type described above.
- jfasi 8y agoInteresting, I've found my opinions align pretty well with who gets hired and who does well, but I'm interested in this research. Will reach out internally.
- thewarrior 8y agoWhat CAN you tell us about the internal data ? Why does the process persist if there's data showing its flawed ?
- jasondclinton 8y agoCribbing from a famous quote: this interview methodology is the worst except for all of the others. We don't know what a systemic, better interviewing system would be.
- vonmoltke 8y agoI don't agree with your Winnie hijack unless you add "systematic" to that as well, like you did in the next sentence. Perhaps the answer is that there is no systematic interviewing system that actually works well. It seems like trying to create one was the origin of all this pain, and the cargo-culting by companies that don't need a systematic process has amplified it. Interviewing is an inherently social, inherently subjective process. Such things are highly resistant to systematic approaches.