3 ms·
Is anyone else similarly frustrated with journalism? This article is 2,300 words - yet it could have transferred the important information in less than 20% of t
by yboris 8y ago
Is anyone else similarly frustrated with journalism? This article is 2,300 words - yet it could have transferred the important information in less than 20% of that.
At least the last few paragraphs included the summary: "[it's good when you are] sticking your butt back and creating this little curve at the lower part of your spine"
- phakding 8y agoI thought I was the only one. Almost every article I read is way longer than it is necessary. Some information is repeated and the gist is tucked away someplace at the bottom.
- codingdave 8y agoAnd if this were in a newspaper, they probably would have. But NPR is like the New Yorker - they are storytellers as much as they are journalists.
- phakding 8y agoI enjoy reading the storytelling if it is for an article based on the events. For example, there were few articles I read about Steele dossier. The articles did lot of flash back into Steele's early life as MI6 agent and his harassment in the hands of FSB etc etc. That was a fascinating read. In an article about science though, I am not looking for a story, I am looking for data and the conclusions/recommendations.
- andyjohnson0 8y agoIt's written for a general audience, who typically want the human angle. This is how journalists are taught to write.
- pcunite 8y agoWhat you're referring to is known as wordiness.
- madeuptempacct 8y agoIronically enough (given that someone mentioned the general audience, which they imply we aren't), most software guides are overly-verbose as hell.
- muzani 8y agoI actually really enjoyed it. I find articles that are like "This Simple Trick Will Cure Your Back" a bit too simplistic. I want to know why the technique works and what's wrong with the standard way we're doing it. They actually split this into 3 different articles/podcasts saying a similar thing and I read them all.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]