2 ms·
> the author cops to being an accomplice to wire fraud Can you not determine who the author is? Based on clues like the author's name in the article heading,
by lowercased 8y ago
> the author cops to being an accomplice to wire fraud
Can you not determine who the author is? Based on clues like the author's name in the article heading, and the comment poster's name being different? And the author posting a reply to the circled comment you posted indicating that this approach does happen, but is sketchy... seems to point to a reading comprehension problem here.
- akanet 8y agoYou're being rude, but to answer your question directly: the author responded to the circled comment with an underlined statement admitting to have knowingly engaged in these services for use by his employer.
- lowercased 8y agoslightly, yes (rude). Offering 2 things (access to one service, then a second service as 'free') does not strike me as automatically 'wire fraud'; we'd need more information to make that determination.