4 ms·
If the computer driver is correct 99% of the time and the human driver 98%, then it is a vast improvement. I imagine that ultimately this technology would resul
by reader5000 16y ago
If the computer driver is correct 99% of the time and the human driver 98%, then it is a vast improvement. I imagine that ultimately this technology would result in almost 0 human input other than e.g. typing in a destination.
- andreyf 16y agotyping in a destination You mean speaking, right? ;)
- ph0rque 16y agoYou mean thinking it, right? ;~)
- mdwrigh2 16y agoDidn't Eric Schmidt say they'd know what you want even before you did? So no thinking required!
- skorgu 16y agoI know you were joking but you're also right. I go food shopping every week at about the same time. I email trip plans between friends and schedule them. I don't drive to work but certainly if I did that's an obviously predictable event. Between synergy among the various google properties and good pattern-recognition in the google cars (or whatever) system itself I'd be surprised if predicted trips didn't hugely overwhelm explicitly-ordered ones.