2 ms·

"Content cartels?" You mean copyright owners? I'm not sure the majority is on your side. A lot of folks, including me, generate copyright-protected content and

by Zanni 8y ago

"Content cartels?" You mean copyright owners? I'm not sure the majority is on your side. A lot of folks, including me, generate copyright-protected content and are happy to see anti-piracy measures enforced. Facebook has other issues, to be sure, but I don't have a problem with this.

mindslight 8y ago
Enjoy your bubble, while it lasts. It's [not] funny how every new "anti-piracy measure" seems more akin to precrime policing. This unrelenting insistence on invasive control is the heart of why copyright and the Internet cannot coexist.
- RaceWon 8y ago
  So you give everything you create away for free? Hmm, how altruistic of you.
- obmelvin 8y ago
  I certainly think that many Hollywood companies are stuck in the stone age in many regards, but these devices are literally built for piracy (with the specific plug-ins, there are very legal uses of Kodi). You may have your own views on copyright, but I don't really see any rational argument for why someone should be able to profit off selling these devices. Yes, the internet makes it easy to circumvent copyright, so then why don't people download this software themselves? If you don't believe the `content cartels` deserve your money then why should someone random person installing free software?
- prolikewh0a 8y ago
  It ends up having the opposite effect anyway. Now people will just buy a ton of Kodi devices. I don't think any majority of the country/world even cares about anti-piracy measures in any direction and certainly doesn't pay attention. While I agree with your point, I think this bubble will stay afloat by pure ignorance alone.
type0 8y ago
> happy to see anti-piracy measures enforced. It's not an anti-piracy measure, they banned a specific brand of software to be sold with the hardware, Heck maybe they should ban Windows PC's because it's even more prevalent with users engaging in piracy and could just as well be sold with some pirated material.

by Zanni 8y ago

mindslight 8y ago

Enjoy your bubble, while it lasts. It's [not] funny how every new "anti-piracy measure" seems more akin to precrime policing. This unrelenting insistence on invasive control is the heart of why copyright and the Internet cannot coexist.

RaceWon 8y ago
So you give everything you create away for free? Hmm, how altruistic of you.
obmelvin 8y ago
I certainly think that many Hollywood companies are stuck in the stone age in many regards, but these devices are literally built for piracy (with the specific plug-ins, there are very legal uses of Kodi). You may have your own views on copyright, but I don't really see any rational argument for why someone should be able to profit off selling these devices. Yes, the internet makes it easy to circumvent copyright, so then why don't people download this software themselves? If you don't believe the `content cartels` deserve your money then why should someone random person installing free software?
prolikewh0a 8y ago
It ends up having the opposite effect anyway. Now people will just buy a ton of Kodi devices. I don't think any majority of the country/world even cares about anti-piracy measures in any direction and certainly doesn't pay attention. While I agree with your point, I think this bubble will stay afloat by pure ignorance alone.

type0 8y ago

> happy to see anti-piracy measures enforced. It's not an anti-piracy measure, they banned a specific brand of software to be sold with the hardware, Heck maybe they should ban Windows PC's because it's even more prevalent with users engaging in piracy and could just as well be sold with some pirated material.