4 ms·
Assuming that there is a more intelligent, more capable person available is the optimistic outlook. What if the reality is that the current crop of CEOs are the
by deegles 8y ago
Assuming that there is a more intelligent, more capable person available is the optimistic outlook. What if the reality is that the current crop of CEOs are the best-equipped people available to deal with this problem and it's not enough?
- bachbach 8y agoThat was my point too. If such people can be found then by all means this is a testable proposition. I had another idea though. Give these journalists what they ask for and attach betting markets to news articles as bets on media bullshit - then we'll see what happens next. I'm sure it will be illuminating. The bets could come in many forms from "Is X true?" where X is measurable to more complex bets like "If X then Y result" where Y objectively measurable. This incentive will balance against the clickbait incentive of journalists and the bookmaker will make more money if more people accept the terms of the bet - so the third party has an incentive to resolve for good quality propositions. Sports bookmakers already slice up complex scenarios into betting proposals so I'm sure this can be accomplished in a way reasonable to all partisans.