4 ms·
> How are you disadvantaged? Umm... what? Are you sure you're replying to the correct thread? > All this does is demolish that <unorganized> sector - and thus
by dingo_bat 8y ago
> How are you disadvantaged?
Umm... what? Are you sure you're replying to the correct thread?
> All this does is demolish that <unorganized> sector - and thus harm the larger economy on which the organized sector depends.
Wrong, this converts a large part of the unorganized sector to organized. Contrary to your assertion, this has helped include the large unorganized sector in the growth story of the country. I believe this is why we're seeing record economic growth.
> but this isn't going to happen quickly.
OK, doesn't mean we shouldn't try to help speed it up.
- intended 8y agoNo it doesn't help - are you aware of why the unorganized sector is not in the organized sector? ---- No disagreement, but this is not the path, and it really cant be sped up. The same way its going to take X amount of time for someone to climb rank in an online game, its going to take time for compliance and ability to comply to catch up. The same way you cant feed jet fuel to a fiat, you cant expect to push the economy beyond its adjustable rate. Wishes arent horses.
- kamaal 8y ago>>OK, doesn't mean we shouldn't try to help speed it up. Who is 'we'? Why does this 'we' think they are entitled to decide for other the terms of economic participation?