3 ms·
I'm anti-GDPR and even I see that as a poor equivalence. The difference? Morality, so maybe to you there's no difference but to others it's obvious. The impleme
by kodablah 8y ago
I'm anti-GDPR and even I see that as a poor equivalence. The difference? Morality, so maybe to you there's no difference but to others it's obvious. The implementation difference, EU hasn't started large-scale blocking of sites that violate its laws (yet).
- miguelrochefort 8y agoChina does what it thinks is best for itself. The compromise is crippling of free speech. I don't like that. Europe does what it thinks is best for itself. The compromise is crippling of innovation. I don't like that. Are they doing the right thing? I don't think so. Is it legitimate for them to do so? Probably. Personally, I believe the best solution is to break the rule. Ignore all regulations (hate speech, GDPR, copyrights, patents, net neutrality, China's firewall) and make it easy for people to do the same thing. They won't be able to enforce their unreasonable regulations, and they'll have to repeal them. That's what I intend to do.