3 ms·
Could you give examples of options that should need a second confirmation? I think the instantness and not having to Apply is great - but maybe I'm not setting
by lovskogen 16y ago
Could you give examples of options that should need a second confirmation? I think the instantness and not having to Apply is great - but maybe I'm not setting the same options as you.
- barrkel 16y agoOn a Windows 7 system, right-click the desktop and select Personalize. Here, you can change the desktop background and window colour theme; changes are previewed instantaneously. But there are two buttons at the bottom: "Save changes" and "Cancel". So you can muck about with full screen preview, but still cancel at any time. It's not a second confirmation: it's an ability to undo what you just did.
- lovskogen 16y agoThat's true, it's better usability. But not all options are so visual that it's easy to muck around and then cancel. E.g turning on Bluetooth – either the user wants to turn in on, or not. Sure, the Apply / Cancel removes the possibility of someone clicking around hitting the "On" checkbox. But I think it's better to optimize for regular use, and not have a Apply button when you just checked to apply.
- barrkel 16y agoI don't think the Apply button is a good idea, as I said in a cousin posting. Ideally changes would be previewed in a modeless dialog, even to the point of temporarily enabling Bluetooth, but still with a cancel option.
- lovskogen 16y agoBut wouldn't the checkbox serve as a cancel option too?